PENERAPAN PRINSIP TANGGUNG JAWAB MUTLAK (STRICT LIABILITY) TERHADAP KERUGIAN AKIBAT IKLAN MENYESATKAN
Keywords:
Advertisement, Consumer, Legal Protection, Absolute Liability.Abstract
One of the company's responsibilities is to provide accurate, transparent and honest information about its products. However, in reality, there are many misleading advertisements that can have many detrimental effects on consumers. One strategy that is considered useful to provide consumers with protection from business actors is the principle of responsibility without fault (absolute responsibility). The problems in this research are: 1) How is the application of the principle of strict liability for losses due to misleading advertising 2) How is the form of legal settlement in the event of losses due to misleading advertising. The method used in the research is normative legal research. Data processing is done with a qualitative juridical approach. The results of the research show: 1) If it is related to the principle of strict liability, the business actor must be directly responsible for the company's actions that cause harm to consumers 2) Legal settlement in the event of losses due to misleading advertising can be done in 2 ways, namely Non-litigation and Litigation.
References
A Sunarno, A. I. (2023). PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP IKLAN YANG MENYESATKAN DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA DAN KODE ETIK PERIKLANAN INDONESIA. Jurnal Paris Langkis, 3 (2), 165.
Kornelius Benuf, M. A. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Jurnal Gema Keadilan , 28.
Muhammad Valgunadi, H. I. (2018). PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP IKLAN YANG MENYESATKAN PADA BROSUR IKLAN PERUMAHAN DIKAITKAN DENGAN PRINSIP TANGGUNG JAWAB MUTLAK (STRICT LIABILITY). JOM Fakultas Hukum, 5 (2), 8-9.
NS Apriliana, E. U. (2019). Pengaruh intensitas melihat iklan di instagram terhadap pengetahuan dan perilaku konsumtif remaja putri. Jurnal komunikasi, 13(2), 181.
PRW Widnyana, A. A. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Mutlak (Strict Liability) dalam Hukum Perlidungan Konsumen. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(2), 247.
Qomaro, G. W. (2019). Product Liability dan Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Produk Berlabel Halal Palsu. Jurnal Pamator, 12(2), 78-79.
Rondonuwu, O. T. (2018). KEDUDUKAN BADAN PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN SEBAGAI LEMBAGA YANG MEMBANTU PENGADUAN KONSUMEN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN. Lex Privatum, 6 (7), 47.
Silvia, A. (2017). PENGARUH PERIKLANAN DAN CITRA MEREK TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN PRODUK KOSMETIK MEREK TLOAC DI BENNYCHEN BANDUNG . JURNAL MANAJEMEN DAN BISNIS (ALMANA), 1 (2), 16.
Utami, P., & Safitri, D. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Konsumen Atas Iklan Produk Kosmetik Yang Menyesatkan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18 (4), 546.
Watuseke, J. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Konsumen Karena Pengaruh Iklan. Lex Privatum, 7(4), 112.
